Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:44:06 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" Subject: Re: 1.1.8-2 Access violation (sshd) Message-ID: <20010205134406.A930@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from xxh1@cdc.gov on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:10:29PM -0500 On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:10:29PM -0500, Heitzso wrote: >There were two of us reporting the register dump. I managed to >sidestep the problem with the user dir; hence my not downloading the >snapshot. Yes, I have hesitations with snapshots, not major but they >can bite (i.e. I walked through all of the Linux 2.4.pre series and >trashed my filesystem when those snapshots had filesystem trashing code >in them). cygwin != linux. It is very unlikely that you trash your filesystem by replacing a DLL. If you're not willing to test a snapshot, that's ok. I'll but out of this thread. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple