Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:23:35 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-2.95.2-7 - libstdc++.a Message-ID: <20010202112335.G22521@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3A7AA446.2F88EB5F@studserv.uni-stuttgart.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A7AA446.2F88EB5F@studserv.uni-stuttgart.de>; from Tilman.Utz@studserv.uni-stuttgart.de on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:12:54PM +0100 On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:12:54PM +0100, Tilman Utz wrote: >Mumit Khan schrieb: >>>And I was wondering why it was not included... >> >>Because the issue is coming up only now, and thanks to this discussion, >>there maybe a solution in future releases. > >That'll be really good, because, IMHO only Mumit's headers and libs >make the -mno-cygwin flag a useful option. I'm still not clear on what these "headers" are. Are they different from cygwin's mingw package? I thought that Earnie was keeping this up-to-date. Just to make things clear: I have very little interest in the -mno-cygwin option to gcc. I'm a Cygwin engineering manager and developer not a No-Cygwin engineering manager and developer. I've put a not-insubstantial amount of time into getting things set up so that they are beginning to work with -mno-cygwin but I am getting rather tired of having to worry about this. I am, as always, waiting for someone to step up and offer actual stuff here. The "Yeah, this will be great!" messages are pretty much white noise at this point. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple