Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Authentication-Warning: tweedle.cabbey.net: cabbey owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:55:28 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher Abbey <cabbey@bresnanlink.net>
X-Sender: cabbey@tweedle.cabbey.net
To: Christopher Faylor <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-2.95.2-7
In-Reply-To: <20010131095947.C4230@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101312150440.5841-100000@tweedle.cabbey.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Today, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 01:05:06AM -0600, Christopher Abbey wrote:
[...]
> > but then I
> >wasn't expecting much yet, because i remember Earnie specfically talking
> >about having to have different libraries.
> 
> Why are you expecting that c++ will magically work?  I didn't mention this in
> the announcement and it wasn'at a goal for the release.

ummm... like I said, "I wasn't expecting much yet, because I remember
Earnie specifically talking about having to have different libraries."
a thought which sparked the next thing I tried which did eventually lead
to a successfull build....   I know it wasn't a goal for the release,
but the goal that was in the release (looking in a different location
when -mno-cygwin was used) was half of what I beleived I needed to make
it work, and it was a half that I currently wasn't able to build for
myself... so I combined that with existing libs... hey presto it worked.

-- 
now the forces of openness have a powerful and
  unexpected new ally - http://ibm.com/linux


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

