Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:03:54 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin and c++ stl... progress? Message-ID: <20010130180354.A21050@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20010130163440.A24655@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:21:39PM -0600 On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:21:39PM -0600, Mumit Khan wrote: >On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I was actually thinking of the pragmatic solution of checking in a >>libstdc++.a file into the mingw repository and releasing that along >>with the mingw stuff. I assume that libstdc++.a would be produced by a >>true mingw gcc. > >Now, that's much better. I would of course then like to see mingw >libgcc.a included as well, unless we can reasonably guarantee that it >won't be needed. I've removed the last two impure_ptr's from libgcc.a in gcc 2.95.2-7. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple