Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:08:57 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Interesting words from gcc.info
Message-ID: <20010129180857.F31725@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20010125164950.A1322@redhat.com> <3A7590CA.5A719AB4@digitalfocus.com> <20010129150110.A27858@washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010129150110.A27858@washington.edu>; from bradleyb@u.washington.edu on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:01:10PM -0800

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:01:10PM -0800, Bradley Bell wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 10:48:26AM -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > The words below were written by Richard Stallman, I believe:
>> > 
>> > Reporting Bugs
>> > **************
>> > 
>> >    Your bug reports play an essential role in making GCC reliable.
>> > 
>> >    When you encounter a problem, the first thing to do is to see if it
>> > is already known.  *Note Trouble::.  If it isn't known, then you should
>> > report the problem.
>> > 
>> >    Reporting a bug may help you by bringing a solution to your problem,
>> > or it may not.  (If it does not, look in the service directory; see
>> > *Note Service::.)  In any case, the principal function of a bug report
>> > is to help the entire community by making the next version of GCC work
>> > better.  Bug reports are your contribution to the maintenance of GCC.
>> > 
>> >    Since the maintainers are very overloaded, we cannot respond to every
>> > bug report.  However, if the bug has not been fixed, we are likely to
>> > send you a patch and ask you to tell us whether it works.
>> > 
>> > Interesting philosophy.
>> 
>> Any part in particular?  (I'm wondering what you're commenting on.)
>
>That's what I was thinking.  Just wait 'till he reads the GNU Manifesto ;-)

I was commenting on the general philosophy of bug reporting.  Few, if
any, of the principles outlined above are in evidence in this mailing
list.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

