Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:42:25 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Is this an Inetd bug Message-ID: <20010119154225.A8409@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3A688F6F.26180012@lightbridge.com> <20010119205138.D9061@cobold.vinschen.de> <3A68A04B.EA2A72E3@lightbridge.com> <5.0.2.1.0.20010119152531.00b17e90@pop.ma.ultranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010119152531.00b17e90@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:26:22PM -0500 On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:26:22PM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc) wrote: >At 03:15 PM 1/19/01, Louis Bohm wrote: >> I know I can ignore it. That it is not doing any harm. What I am asking >>is, should it not report correct data to the event viewer. Is this >>something that will be taken care of in the future??? > > >Patches gratefully accepted (tm)!;-) You'll be hearing from my lawyers. :-) cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple