Subject: Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
From: Bob McGowan <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:42:04 -0800

My apologies for failing to do an exhaustive archive search before responding.

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
> >Based on the man page for 'pwd':
> >
> > "...That is, all components of the printed name will be actual
> >  directory names -- none will be symbolic links."
> >
> >I'd say this is a bug.
> 
> I'd say that this has been discussed in the mailing list several times
> already.
> 
> cgf
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

-- 
Bob McGowan
Staff Software Quality Engineer
VERITAS Software
[email-masked]

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple