Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:04:43 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
Message-ID: <20010116200443.A10173@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <OFF186A1CB.218CF568-ON862569D6.0076B70D@RCHLAND.IBM.COM> <3A64D197.514DD0FA@veritas.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3A64D197.514DD0FA@veritas.com>; from rmcgowan@veritas.com on Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0800

On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
>Based on the man page for 'pwd':
>
> "...That is, all components of the printed name will be actual
>  directory names -- none will be symbolic links."
>
>I'd say this is a bug.

I'd say that this has been discussed in the mailing list several times
already.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

