Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3A64AEC9.2108AD6B@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:27:53 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Earnie Boyd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mumit Khan CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: two differents version of unctrl.h, one in cygwin-1.1.7 and one in ncurses-5.2 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mumit Khan wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > In this case, I'm not sure exactly why newlib has a unctrl.h file, though. > > I'm willing to use the ncurses version instead if that is the consensus. > > The ncurses layout on my linux system seems to be different than cygwin > > though so I don't see a clear correspondence. > > Newlib has a bunch of stuff thrown in that may be there just for > historical reasons, or to support certain targets. I don't see any > other reason for newlib to contain unctrl. I have yet to see a non- > curses program include unctrl.h, but of course someone must've done > it for it to be included in newlib. Is there a problem in ncurses > one overwriting the newlib one? I can't see it offhand, but that's > untested. > The problem will be the other way 'round. If there is a new release of the Cygwin runtime it will overlay the header from ncurses. Cheers, Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple