Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <3A643F10.480F6601@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:31:12 -0500 From: Charles Wilson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Earnie Boyd CC: "Dr. Volker Zell" , cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: two differents version of unctrl.h, one in cygwin-1.1.7 and one in ncurses-5.2 References: <3A63CEBA.6509B31@ece.gatech.edu> <3A643D02.BCA1CC9C@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Earnie Boyd wrote: > > Charles Wilson wrote: > > > > I'll release a new ncurses where the ncurses version of unctrl.h is > > renamed 'nunctrl.h' and change all internal ncurses references to point > > to the new file. But I can't guarantee any time frame on that. > > > > I don't know about the rest of this list but I would prefer it be > /usr/include/ncurses/unctrl.h. It is then obvious as to what it is > for. If you name it nunctrl.h then it won't be that obvious. But if I do that, then where should all the other include files for ncurses go? It's really odd for them to be split between /usr/include and /usr/include/ncurses/ . However, ncurses is not like readline -- it doesn't like to install its header files into a subdirectory of /usr/include. (e.g. the #include directives for most packages that depend on ncurses reference , not . This also goes for the ncurses header files themselves -- they inter-reference , not or "foo.h". --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple