Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:44:20 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: "The PATH problem" Message-ID: <20010112104420.A8777@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3A5F15A2.F8D56ABC@yahoo.com> <3A5E927F.7009.7C9D21F@localhost> <3A5F15A2.F8D56ABC@yahoo.com> <20010112095045.F8279@redhat.com> <4.3.1.2.20010112102902.0226c948@pop.ma.ultranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010112102902.0226c948@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0500 On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >At 09:50 AM 1/12/2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>What kind of UNIX emulation would Cygwin be if you couldn't modify your >>PATH??? > > >This is clearly a rhetorical question but in case anyone isn't sure, the >answer to the question is "a bad one", which Cygwin certainly is NOT. > >(...now back to modifying my path from bash...;-)) Phew. I wasn't sure. Thanks for clarifying this issue. :-) cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple