Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:46:53 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin Subject: Re: mount of route directory,injustice Message-ID: <20010111114653.C14548@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <20010110095021.L4141@cobold.vinschen.de> <200101110114.AA00156@eme01507.ag.wakwak.com> <20010111082635.T4141@cobold.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010111082635.T4141@cobold.vinschen.de>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:26:35AM +0100 On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:26:35AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:14:10AM +0900, Yasuo Hosotani wrote: >> thanks. >> I avoided a trouble in the method, too. >> >> Is mount to the route directory added >> except that the mount command is used? > >I just realized that you're talking about the root directory. >I'm having a long line to the brain today. > >For your information: If the first application loads cygwin1.dll >it checks for the existence of a root directory in the registry. >If it doesn't find one, it adds it as C: == / into HKCU. Actually, cygwin shouldn't do this anymore. I believe that Kazuhiro Fujieda modified cygwin to avoid doing this since a while ago. It did do this in the Cygwin 1.0 days, though, so you're right that this may be what happened here. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple