Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <3A3F911D.5CBF4066@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:47:25 -0500 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive References: <013901c06960$9ff3dd30$ad9560cb@workhorse> <20001218214202.A5253@redhat.com> <0012191352330A.28008@cygbert> <20001219111041.A8423@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin setting? > In fact, maybe a > > mount -n c:\foo /foo # use NTSEC semantics > > would be sort of nice. Yes, it would. But, how would cp foo //bar/baz be hamdled? Besides, this is something you'd configure one way or the other for all SMB shares -- either you're a domain user or you're not. So, it probably shouldn't be set on a per-share or per-mount basis, but rather it should be set globally for a particular user/installation. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple