Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:10:41 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive Message-ID: <20001219111041.A8423@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <013901c06960$9ff3dd30$ad9560cb@workhorse> <20001218214202.A5253@redhat.com> <0012191352330A.28008@cygbert> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <0012191352330A.28008@cygbert>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:52:33PM +0100 On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Tuesday 19 December 2000 03:42, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:08:45PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: "Charles S. Wilson" >> >To: "Corinna Vinschen" >> > >> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Sounds reasonable to me. CYGWIN=smbfakeperm ? CYGWIN=nodomain ? >> > >> >CYGWIN=SMBisBroken ? >> >> CYGWIN=ilikepie ? >> >> Nah. Too much of a possibility of misinterpretation. > >I know, this is somewhat dry but I have decided to use [no]smbntsec. > >What I'm curious about is what do you think should be the default? >Personally I would prefer to have smbntsec off by default but to >have it on by default would match the current behaviour. > >Opinions? Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin setting? In fact, maybe a mount -n c:\foo /foo # use NTSEC semantics would be sort of nice. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple