Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: Corinna Vinschen Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 22:19:02 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: cygwin References: <0012171246140L.00473@cygbert> <3A3D17E5.CEE59145@ece.gatech.edu> In-Reply-To: <3A3D17E5.CEE59145@ece.gatech.edu> Subject: Re: CVS permissions problem with network drive MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0012172219020D.21902@cygbert> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id QAA03663 On Sunday 17 December 2000 20:45, Charles S. Wilson wrote: > It would be nice if ntsec behaved 'nontsec'-like when > accessing shares when the user accounts involved are not domain > accounts. That way, I could continue to use ntsec for most stuff > (local file access) but share access 'just works' with less strict > file security. Does that describe the 'extra checks' you said you > needed to add, Corinna? You got it. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to do this check whether someone is a domain user with reasonable cost. Currently I would prefer a simple check to ignore SMB mounts completely which results in the typical faked permissions as on FAT partitions. This could be controlled by an additional CYGWIN flag, perhaps. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com