Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:13:20 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20001217050647.6558.qmail@web114.yahoomail.com> <20001217000924.A10003@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20001217000924.A10003@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: delete old version?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0012171313200P.00473@cygbert>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id HAA18517

On Sunday 17 December 2000 06:09, you wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:06:47PM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >--- DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> wrote:
> >> > The only thing I can see objectionable would be the time limit
> >> > for source distribution; but, you would know better about that
> >> > than I would.
> >>
> >> There is no minimum time limit when you distribute the source with
> >> the binary.  See GPL 3a.  You're thinking of GPL 3b, which
> >> requires a *written* promise.  We can't do that with FTP.
> >>
> >> If they didn't get the source when they downloaded the binary, we
> >> have no further obligations to them.
> >
> >Ah, yes.  Then I suggest removal of the old directory as people
> > really should upgrade if they want help.
>
> Strong ditto.
>
> I'd like to get rid of the B20 and B19 stuff in this process as well.
>  I'll archive them somewhere but I would rather not keep them around
> as there still seems to be a lot of confusion about B20.

Yes, trash it.

Corinna

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

