Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 00:09:24 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: delete old version? Message-ID: <20001217000924.A10003@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20001217050647.6558.qmail@web114.yahoomail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20001217050647.6558.qmail@web114.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:06:47PM -0800 On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:06:47PM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote: >--- DJ Delorie wrote: >> >> > The only thing I can see objectionable would be the time limit for source >> > distribution; but, you would know better about that than I would. >> >> There is no minimum time limit when you distribute the source with the >> binary. See GPL 3a. You're thinking of GPL 3b, which requires a >> *written* promise. We can't do that with FTP. >> >> If they didn't get the source when they downloaded the binary, we have >> no further obligations to them. >> > >Ah, yes. Then I suggest removal of the old directory as people really should >upgrade if they want help. Strong ditto. I'd like to get rid of the B20 and B19 stuff in this process as well. I'll archive them somewhere but I would rather not keep them around as there still seems to be a lot of confusion about B20. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com