Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001212012027.02cd5a30@pop.bresnanlink.net> X-Sender: cabbey@pop.bresnanlink.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 01:23:41 -0600 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Chris Abbey Subject: Re: [long] Re: signals? In-Reply-To: <20001212020549.A29632@redhat.com> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001211233737.02885010@pop.bresnanlink.net> <5.0.0.25.0.20001211202412.02930eb0@pop.bresnanlink.net> <4.3.2.7.0.20001113000139.00c3ba60@pop.bresnanlink.net> <4.3.2.7.0.20001001212519.00c09bb0@pop> <4.3.2.7.0.20001001212519.00c09bb0@pop> <20001002114023.H13304@cygnus.com> <4.3.2.7.0.20001113000139.00c3ba60@pop.bresnanlink.net> <20001113115655.J7424@redhat.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20001211202412.02930eb0@pop.bresnanlink.net> <20001212002741.D22048@redhat.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20001211233737.02885010@pop.bresnanlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 02:05 12/12/00 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:54:02AM -0600, Chris Abbey wrote: > >At 00:27 12/12/00 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:21:05PM -0600, Chris Abbey wrote: > >> >At 11:56 11/13/00 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >>Dunno. Probably, you're sending more than one CTRL-BREAK. It works > >> >>fine for me. > >> >> > >> >>cgf > >> > > >> >ok, I'd ask that you (and anyone else with a couple minutes) humor me > >> > >>If the "you" here is me, then I respectfully decline. > > > >it was, (the parenthetical was for anyone else) primarily because > >you claim this works for you, and I see no way in hell it can. > >I respectfully deduce then that you claim "wfm" without actually > >having ever tried it... > >Now you're just being insulting. That wasn't the intention, it is a perfectly logical deduction. My apologies if I've offended, which clearly I have. >I guess I will stop reading this thread now. > >Bye, bye, I hope not, as the latter portions of the note, which I fear you've not read, were the type of information you asked for... namely what's happening in cygwin which I don't fully understand. now the forces of openness have a powerful and unexpected new ally http://ibm.com/linux/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com