Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:13:05 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.3 on Cygwin 1.1.5
Message-ID: <20001120171305.A10949@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <20001120140411.I370@dothill.com> <20001120142118.B7398@redhat.com> <20001120170601.A439@dothill.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20001120170601.A439@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:06:01PM -0500

On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 05:06:01PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:21:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:04:11PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>>>Attached is a PostgreSQL 7.0.3 on Cygwin 1.1.5 patch.  It is an update
>>>to the PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 3) patch.  Note that this
>>>patch still incorporates Pete's 10/26/2000 patch:
>>>
>>>    http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-ports/2000-10/msg00066.html
>> >    
>>>Please use it instead of the older PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 patches.
>> 
>>It would be nice if we started using the cygwin-apps mailing list for
>>this kind of stuff.  cygwin-apps has a lot of subscribers but almost
>>zero traffic.
>
>Sorry for the noise.  The "by-approval" nature of cygwin-apps assisted
>in my laziness.  I will apply for approval and if accepted, then I will
>post to cygwin-apps instead of cygwin for "this kind of stuff."

I wasn't complaining.  I was just musing.  I would never complain to anyone
who posted a patch and was obviously working on improving things rather
than speculating on how things could be improved.

I honestly was wondering if cygwin-apps was useful.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com