Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:44:58 +0000
Message-ID: <352-Fri17Nov2000144458+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
From: David Starks-Browning <starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: PLEASE use mirrors
In-Reply-To: <3A150DFC.B799E61F@redhat.com>
References: <20001108223543.A7934@redhat.com>
	<8970-Thu16Nov2000154022+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
	<20001116111606.C19438@redhat.com>
	<3A150DFC.B799E61F@redhat.com>

On Friday 17 Nov 00, Corinna Vinschen writes:
> What's the problem here at all? Most of the existing mirrors are
> mirroring the snapshots as well. Of course, they mirror the ftp
> snapshots but why should it be necessary to mirror http? Wouldn't
> it be easier to drop the http snapshot page in favor of ftp and
> cvs?

I wrote about this a few weeks(?) ago on the developers list, and
Chris (rightfully) pointed out that we can't rely on mirrors for
snapshots, because of the propogation delay.  (I had asked for a link
to mirrors.html from the snapshots page, just to make navigation to
mirrors easier, since I could never get into sourceware via ftp.)

If http traffic is not capped like ftp, then http access to the
snapshots ought to solve the problem.

Cheers,
David


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com