Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:45:51 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin Subject: Re: Can cygwin be used on windows 2000 ? Message-ID: <20001115144551.B15937@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <4.3.1.2.20001115122349.00b89b00@pop.ma.ultranet.com> <3A12E0AF.B2A7AFE4@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A12E0AF.B2A7AFE4@redhat.com>; from vinschen@redhat.com on Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:14:55PM +0100 On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:14:55PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: >> >> At 12:16 PM 11/15/2000, Bishop Chad-QCB004 wrote: >> >Can cygwin be used on windows 2000 ? >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Chad Bishop >> >> Yes. >> >> Any chance that we could get the FAQ and/or the main Cygwin home page updated >> to mention W2K too? > >Do you know the next question? It's: "The FAQ mentions that Cygwin >works on Windows 2000 but did somebody really try it?" > >Personally I wonder why so many people ask that question instead of >simply trying it. And, why would anyone assume that it *doesn't* work? Windows 2000 isn't exactly new anymore. I could understand questions about Windows Me, but not Windows 2000. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com