Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 11:16:29 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: Cygwin Subject: Re: binutils-20001029-1.tar.gz is missing info files Message-ID: <20001115111629.C7893@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin References: <20001115102903.A303@dothill.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20001115102903.A303@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:29:03AM -0500 On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:29:03AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >Attempting to search the archives for binutils 20001029-1 and gcc >2.95.2-3, I don't seem to find any announcements for these versions. Is >it encouraged or discouraged to use these versions. If setup installs it by default, it is encouraged. In fact, it's required. I don't know why the info files are missing for binutils, however. I did discuss 2.95.2-3 in this mailing list. It was the version that DJ patched to fix the CRLF cpp problems. The lack of an announcement for 20001019 was an oversight. I was waiting for this to propagate to mirrors and then forgot about it. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com