Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:44:15 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Cc: allan@object-forge.com
Subject: Re: Process limit
Message-ID: <20001111124415.A24272@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com, allan@object-forge.com
References: <20001110133756.B20091@redhat.com> <NEBBINMIJCNCBHCBKMOJCENMCBAA.allan@object-forge.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <NEBBINMIJCNCBHCBKMOJCENMCBAA.allan@object-forge.com>; from allan@object-forge.com on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:38:43PM -0000

On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:38:43PM -0000, Allan Clearwaters wrote:
>I know you don't want to commit but how soon is "...soon" - days, weeks?
>The reason for my question relates to some work I'm doing where I suspect
>the process limit under the current version of 1.1 is getting in my way.  In
>any case, if there were no process limit then it would allow me a bit more
>freedom.

You're right that I steadfastly refuse to give release dates, especially
when prodded.  It sets a dangerous precedent.  Look back over the cygwin
mailing list in the last few weeks and draw your own conclusions.

>While we're on the subject, are there any good reference sites about the
>Windows process/task api either in general or under Cygwin?

The process/task api in cygwin is the same as UNIX.  What would you expect?
Windows APIs are documented on the Microsoft site.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

