Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "Rick Rankin" <rick_rankin@yahoo.com>,
        "Larry Hall \(RFK Partners, Inc\)" <lhall@rfk.com>,
        "Cygwin" <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: RE: Some domain groups not found by 'mkgroup --domain'
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:19:21 +0300
Message-ID: <002e01c049b8$cc0c6b70$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20001108175230.6488.qmail@web801.mail.yahoo.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Rick Rankin
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 8:53 PM
> To: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc); Cygwin
> Subject: Re: Some domain groups not found by 'mkgroup --domain'
>
>
> No, these groups are different. They are domain groups, yet there
> seems to be a
> distinction between a "global" domain group and a "local" domain
> group. These
> "local" domain groups do not show up with either 'mkgroup -d' or
> 'mkgroup -l'.
>
> Sorry, I should have been more specific.
>

Can you provide an example? To my best knowledge, such thing simply does not
exist (in NT4 domain, that is). You have users and groups defined on domain
controller(s) - they are global, domain-wide. And you have users and groups
defined on domain member(s) - they are local _for_each_member_.

If have NT workstation A and B they have different "local" groups (even with
the same names). May be, you mean these?

-andrej


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com