Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Andrej Borsenkow" , , "gnuwin32" Subject: RE: Why does ls report some directory dates as future? Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 20:06:57 +0400 Message-ID: <000201c03aaf$c597ed90$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000001c03aaa$aa639c40$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 > > The only comment is that all directories with wrong time are mount > points, and > they point to the FAT drives (root directory of FAT drives to be precise). I > cannot reproduce it with the same snapshot under Win2k with NTFS. If I mount > d: on /dosd I get correct time. That agrees with your output where > NTFS drives > do not have this problem. > > So, it smells like Cygwin bug. > OTOH does root of FAT drive have any associated time at all? Probably, not. -andrej -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com