Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "Cygwin Mailing List" <Cygwin@Sourceware.Cygnus.Com>
Subject: Text vs. binary - should symlink be resolved?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 19:40:13 +0400
Message-ID: <000101c03aac$097c4960$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

Text vs. binary processing is based on whether file resides on binary or text
mounted filesystem.

Currently Cygwin seems to check original filename as passed to open call. This
leads to interesting effect - symlink may point anywhere, and target may
reside on filesystem mounted with different option.

IMHO the rule to determine open mode should be applied to symlink target
(final target) - after all, that is _the_ file itself.

What do you think?

cheers

-andrej

Have a nice DOS!
B >>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

