Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 10:19:14 -0400 To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: linux compatibility Message-ID: <20001014101914.C14060@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com References: <200010132129.RAA22588@envy.delorie.com> <000c01c03560$d1dfede0$1d01a8c0@BRAEMARINC.COM> <20001013204631.B3048@cygnus.com> <39E82575.1B8701A9@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <39E82575.1B8701A9@cygnus.com>; from vinschen@cygnus.com on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:20:53AM +0200 On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:20:53AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 11:20:53 +0200 >From: Corinna Vinschen >Reply-To: cygwin >To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com >Subject: Re: RFC: linux compatibility > >Chris Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:59:11PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> >What about the "Single Unix Specification" at Opengroup >> >> I actually have been using the documents at this site as the basis for >> most of the work I do for Cygwin. >> >> When they don't mention a feature, I usually use Linux. Unfortunately, >> it's not Red Hat linux, specifically. Instead it is the cgf linux >> distribution (tm) that I've built up over the years. > >That's my favorite order. SUS first, Linux if something is missing in SUS >and as last resort Commodore 64. Uh, oh, forget the last one... That's right. Commodore 64? TRS-80 rules! cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com