Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:35:33 -0400
Message-Id: <200010132135.RAA22649@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com>
To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20001013172652.N1492@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on
	Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:26:52 -0400)
Subject: Re: RFC: linux compatibility
References: <20001013211422.6698.qmail@web122.yahoomail.com> <20001013172652.N1492@cygnus.com>


> My biggest concern is backwards compatibility.
> Is it worth Linux compatibility if it means "cygwin2.dll"?

The timezone API is the biggest problem here, and the most visible.
Changing that might break compatibility all by itself.  I haven't
checked into the whole story enough to know for sure.  I agree
backward compatibility is an important goal.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com