Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20001012111821.02033bb8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender: lhall@pop.ma.ultranet.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:22:39 -0400
To: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>, cygwin@sources.redhat.com
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin RCS Build Instructions (or sometimes ash does not
  like a.out)
In-Reply-To: <20001012150246.989.qmail@web113.yahoomail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 11:02 AM 10/12/2000, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>--- Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com> wrote:
> > 
> > ash wants files to have the executable bit set.  Cygwin fakes this by looking
> > for files with specific extensions and setting the bit in that case.
> > 
> > '.out' is not one of the extensions.
> > 
>
>IMO, .out should be considered as "one of the extensions".  After all cmd.exe
>will execute a file with a .out extension.  At least on my NT4sp4 machine,
>YMMV.
>
>Cheers,
>
>=====
>Earnie Boyd
>mailto:earnie_boyd@yahoo.com


While I'm not disagreeing with you, as I recall, NT-based systems will be 
able to run any executable, regardless of the extension.  Extensions are
needed for 9x platforms and Explorer it seems.


Larry Hall                              lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

