Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:16:39 -0400 To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: getopts missing with latest cygwin Message-ID: <20001010141639.E3833@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com References: <1001010143632.AA82047.SM@nike.ins.cwru.edu> <20001010124922.J3352@cygnus.com> <00cf01c032e2$9eb9fa80$c4acb018@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <00cf01c032e2$9eb9fa80$c4acb018@home.com>; from enolte@campuspipeline.com on Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:50:46AM -0600 On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:50:46AM -0600, Erik Nolte wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:36:32AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: >> >> The "ash maintainer" is either me or Corinna. FWIW, I don't plan on >> >> changing this. I want ash to be small and fast when running configure >> >> scripts. I've stripped ash down to support only the minimal set of >> >> functionality found in older versions of UNIX. I use the /bin/sh on >> >> Digital UNIX 3.2 as a reference. >> > >> >You might as well use the V7 sh man page as your reference, since the >> >version you're using provides little more. Does the cygwin sh support >> >shell functions? (Those weren't in v7.) >> >> I might do that. But I don't. > >Shell functions are supported in ash. I was referring to using V7 as a reference. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com