Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: bgat@open-widgets.com Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:14:58 -0500 To: Benjamin Riefenstahl Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Cygwin gdb-5.0 h8300 sim needs wait.h Message-ID: <20001010111458.A22246@sol.open-widgets.com> References: <20001010092621.A21489@sol.open-widgets.com> <39E337A7.3BEB0692@ision.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <39E337A7.3BEB0692@ision.net>; from Benjamin.Riefenstahl@ision.net on Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:37:11PM +0200 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Benny: > My docs say that wait() should be declared in . On my > machine Cygwin has that header and it does indeed declare wait(). Doh. My linux box has a /usr/include/wait.h that just includes sys/wait.h. When I failed to find /usr/include/wait.h on my cygwin box, I looked no further. Indeed, there *is* a /usr/include/sys/wait.h in cygwin. For some reason, though, there is no /usr/include/wait.h, and that's what gdb wants. I created one, and now I'm building again. Who is right, do you think? Should gdb really be #including , or should cygwin offer a /usr/include/wait.h? b.g. --=20 Bill Gatliff bgat@open-widgets.com --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE540CCBh0t1GoTfuIRAmPAAJ9yzowFWZW65EFygMxbyZZ0KmR6iACgyhhP IbNUZS3kaAtbDdYzmIWuL7M= =58xc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--