Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:42:37 -0400
To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bash patches
Message-ID: <20001005194237.A24728@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
References: <20001005233055.29843.qmail@web116.yahoomail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <20001005233055.29843.qmail@web116.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:30:55PM -0700

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:30:55PM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> >Hmm, interesting, I'd suggest doing a Google search for setmode.  Seems that
>> >BSD has a different idea of what setmode() is to be used for.
>> 
>> Actually, it looks like the same thing to me.  It's a method for changing
>> the mode of an open file handle.
>> 
>> It looks like Cygwin's version of setmode is limited compared to BSD's but
>> it's probably too late to change that now.
>> 
>
>Uhm, I don't think that file permission modes as described by chmod(1) is the
>same thing as setting O_TEXT or O_BINARY on an fd.  It just doesn't sound the
>same to me.
>
>http://www.rocketaware.com/man/man3/setmode.3.htm

There seems to be am epidemic of people not reading the entire thread before
responding to email here, lately.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

