Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin question
From: Earnie Boyd <[email-masked]>
To: Andreas Eibach <[email-masked]>
Cc: cygwin Mailing <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:44:54 -0700 (PDT)

--- Andreas Eibach <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > What is the reason for Non-Cygwin executables.
> 
> If there wasn't a reason, -mno-cygwin wouldn't have invented.
> Think logically. :)
> 
> (Or what other meaning did this statement intend to have?)
> 

Well if there wasn't a reason to have Cygwin then that wouldn't have been
invented either.  You've taken my question out of context, read the rest of the
thread.  The poster is trying to use -mno-cygwin when s/he needs Cygwin or i.e.
POSIX.

Cheers,

=====
Earnie Boyd
mailto:[email-masked]

---         <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com>         ---
--- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/> ---
---   Minimalist GNU for Windows <http://www.mingw.org/>   ---

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [email-masked]