Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:45:53 -0400 To: "'cygwin@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: Re: sig_send: wait for sig_complete event failed Message-ID: <20001002114553.J13304@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin@sources.redhat.com'" References: <2E300728EEF9D3119D8000E018C1864F5E428C@gemini> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <2E300728EEF9D3119D8000E018C1864F5E428C@gemini>; from Andy.Mortimer@software.aeat.com on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 05:49:35AM -0600 On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 05:49:35AM -0600, Mortimer, Andy wrote: >I will try to test the new snapshot sooner rather than later; I had >a look just now, but the latest snapshot (2000-Sep-29) doesn't >seem to include anything "obvious". Is this the one I should try, >or will the changes be in the next snapshot build? I'm usually pretty careful to only mention a snapshot when the code is actually in the snapshot. The most recent snapshot has the code that I was referring to. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com