Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 15:26:30 -0400 To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: OpenGL: did you decide about distribution with cygwin ? Message-ID: <20000928152630.C13717@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com References: <4.3.2.7.0.20000928094308.00b762f0@courriel.polymtl.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20000928094308.00b762f0@courriel.polymtl.ca>; from andre.bleau@courriel.polymtl.ca on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:16:51AM -0400 On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Andre Bleau wrote: >There has been some concern lately about the availability of OpenGL under >the cygwin distribution. I think I explained about the version confusion. >Did you (Chris, DJ, Corinna) decide if OpenGL will continue to be included >in cygwin's distribution ? I really think that would be more convenient >for programmers who want to build OpenGL apps in the cygwin environment. My basic concern was that there was a flurry of people reporting problems and you were not responding to them. I already have a few crucial packages where the maintainer is MIA (bash, gcc, binutils) and I don't want to add to the list. If you can guarantee that you'll be around for a while and are willing to answer questions, I'll put the package back. Otherwise, I'd prefer to leave this out of the cygwin release. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com