Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 21:26:53 -0400
To: "'cygwin@sources.redhat.com'" <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Setup, Cygwin or tar problem
Message-ID: <20000914212653.B28581@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin@sources.redhat.com'" <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
References: <896908DA55C4D311B9C000C04F01A05406F94B@ENTERPRISE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <896908DA55C4D311B9C000C04F01A05406F94B@ENTERPRISE>; from Harold@compasstechnologies.com on Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 09:18:03PM -0400

On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 09:18:03PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
>Did you reinstall so recently that it was after my patch was applied?

No.  I just updated today and tried it again, though, to test another
installation problem, though, and saw that your patch had been applied.

>Furthermore, since you work at Cygnus, with DJ, I am assuming that you
>are using Samba 2.05, as DJ said he tested setup with that version and
>it worked fine; so, the bug may never present itself to you.  That's
>just my counter-point to your counter-point,

I am using Samba 2.07.  DJ works in New Hampshire and I work in
Massachusetts.  Corinna works in Germany.  We all have different setups,
which is a good thing.

Regardless, this was just an observation about Earnie's problem.  Earnie
was positing that there was a problem reinstalling over an old
installation.  I was just saying that I'd done just that with no ill
effects.

I mentioned that I was testing samba installation only as a passing data
point.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com