Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com X-Originating-IP: [212.54.81.249] From: "Jonas Jensen" To: , "Cygwin List" References: <20000902123113.A1626@cygnus.com> <200009021933.AA01256@mlx.com> Subject: Re: printf is faster when piped through tee Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 21:50:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Sep 2000 19:49:09.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC7FF110:01C01516] > > Did you do this on purpose or something? It seems a bit weird that a write > > takes _excactly_ 1/100th of a second, both on my GeForce-powered desktop > > comp. and my weak laptop... > > I think disk I/O speed is probably much more dependant on your > (E)IDE controller & disk than the things generally considered > performance enhancement points on newer PCs. ie. CPU, RAM, video, > etc ... If we were talking SCSI, then I'd be more surprised. Ok, maybe that paragraph was a bit ambiguous... Next time you'll want to read the whole thread. I'm talking about writing to the screen, not the disk. For the record, I'm using SCSI, so don't ya worry ;-) -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com