Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 12:31:13 -0400 To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: printf is faster when piped through tee Message-ID: <20000902123113.A1626@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin List References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: ; from bones0_list@hotmail.com on Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:11:08PM +0200 On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:11:08PM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote: >Something's wrong with the performance of printf. When compiling with gcc, >printf executes much slower than with Microsoft's "cl". The funny thing is >that when I pipe those programs through "tee", they're both (equally) fast. Thanks for the first part of your report. I'm awaiting your analysis of why this is the case. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com