Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <398B2C07.156FD229@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 16:48:07 -0400 From: "John A. Turner" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin mailing list Subject: setup source? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit is the source for setup available? I'd like to investigate the possibility of modifying it to give the user the choice of whether to install ash or bash as sh the reasons are as follows: o I've been making sh bash since b18 or so o I don't care about the speed differences between ash and bash o I get the impression many others feel the same (e.g. on the xemacs-nt mailing list) o I've been bitten by the "sh is really ash" problem more often since the transition to the automated, setup-based install method (which I like very much), since it always reverts sh to ash, and I have to remember to fix it each time I update o I figure it's better to offer to try and make the mods to obtain the behavior I want than to simply whine about it and demand that it's my right that someone do this immediately (I know this goes against standard procedure on this list, but hey, sometimes boundaries need to be pushed :) and finally, although I've poked around sourceware a bit, I can't find the source to setup thanks... -John Turner -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com