Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
From: "Andre Oliveira da Costa" <costa@cade.com.br>
To: "cygwin" <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: Accessing local hard disks
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:01:54 -0300
Message-ID: <001c01bffc92$9885bef0$5400000a@costa>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-reply-to: <3987D106.9C6F76A1@cygnus.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Importance: Normal

Hi Corinna,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 4:43 AM
> To: Mathis Severin
> Cc: 'cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com'
> Subject: Re: Accessing local hard disks

[snip]

> Try it. Symlinks should be slower in either case but I can't remember
> of any published performance measurement.

I remember once reading something on the list stating that a big mount table
could lead to loss of performance. Is this still true with the new versions
of the lib? (1.1.x)

TIA.

Andre Costa
--
André Oliveira da Costa
(costa@cade.com.br)


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com