Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:22:53 -0400
To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com, Cygwin@Sourceware.Cygnus.Com
Subject: Re: Extending cygwin's process table (progress report)
Message-ID: <20000725132253.A12565@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com, Cygwin@Sourceware.Cygnus.Com
References: <85256927.0047B00E.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <85256927.0047B00E.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com>; from yap_noel@jpmorgan.com on Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:03:05AM -0400

On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:03:05AM -0400, Noel L Yap wrote:
>cgf@cygnus.com on 2000.07.24 22:51:36
>>My reason this week is that all of the Windows 95 pids are very
>>small negative numbers.
>
>Are you sure they're not very high unsigned numbers?

Since pid_t is signed, it really doesn't matter.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com