Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:51:36 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Extending cygwin's process table (progress report) Message-ID: <20000724225136.A9327@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com References: <20000718234319.A16333@cygnus.com> <20000724001546.A24454@cygnus.com> <20000724002537.A24506@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000724002537.A24506@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:25:37AM -0400 On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:25:37AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:15:46AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >>Ok. I have pulled apart cygwin's process table creation and >>reimplemented everything using windows pids. The result is pretty >>incredible. > >I should point out that many other times when I've done something to >cygwin that resulted in a big performance increase, the reason was >that I'd stupidly forgotten some crucial detail. > >Hopefully that isn't the case here. I just wanted to mention that I tried my changes on Windows 95. I hate Windows 95. I don't think I've mentioned that this week. My reason this week is that all of the Windows 95 pids are very small negative numbers. Sigh. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com