Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:33:56 -0400 To: "cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com" Subject: Re: Have rename() semantics changed? Message-ID: <20000714113356.I14460@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: "cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com" References: <779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D9979171747@silldn_mail1.sanwaint.com> <779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D9979171747@silldn_mail1.sanwaint.com> <4.3.1.2.20000713122755.01dbc620@pop.ma.ultranet.com> <396EE0BA.20437355@cybertec.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <396EE0BA.20437355@cybertec.com.au>; from cjohns@cybertec.com.au on Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:43:22PM +1000 On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:43:22PM +1000, Chris Johns wrote: >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: >> According to the MSDN, FILE_SHARE_DELETE is a NT/W2K thingy. That implies >> that this functionality is only available there. One would hope that >> enabling it doesn't cause 9x to misbehave but who knows. I suppose the >> constant could be conditionally compiled in if need be... > >This may explain the patch problem I reported not long ago. I think I >failed to meantion this was on Win95. Since the change in question only affected Windows NT, this is unlikely. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com