Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:19:09 -0400 To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: runtime failure in 20000710 and 20000711 snapshots Message-ID: <20000713141909.A32159@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from cbjones@nortelnetworks.com on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 11:23:40AM -0400 On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 11:23:40AM -0400, Christopher Jones wrote: >I have a recent snapshot (07/08) so I took a look at this and indeed the >execute bit does not show up for any of the .dll files in usr/bin/. In my >case I explicitly set nontsec in the CYGWIN variable and some applications >are working while others are not. That's because you're using a snapshot. Sometimes stuff breaks. >I've tried using chmod +x on those dlls without affect. The bits still >remain rw-r--r--... this is on a FAT partition under NT 4.0 with >binary mounts. Is chmod supposed to do anything in this case? No. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com