Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Message-ID: <3949EC1E.82BB41FB@dddandr.octacon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 09:58:06 +0100
From: Don Sharp <Don.Sharp@dddandr.octacon.co.uk>
Reply-To: dwsharp@iee.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gnuwin32 <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: /usr/bin and /usr/lib mount points (WAS: RE: telnet problems with 
 current cygwin version)
References: <20000615130755.20768.qmail@web113.yahoomail.com> <005501bfd70b$619cc7a0$a8a11dcb@ihug.co.nz> <200006152101.RAA14784@envy.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > But why are they mount points instead of ordinary directories? Normal
> 
> Because we never know whether a program should go in /bin or /usr/bin,
> so the mounts make all programs appear in both places.
> 

Please put this in the installation notes and/or the FAQ. I had been
wondering why the recommendation from Earnie was so strongly voiced. Now
I understand.
I have ash, bash, sh and cygwin as the only entries in /bin and the
shells are
also present in /usr/bin. On balance I agree the mount makes more sense
for Cygwin.

Thanks

Don Sharp

> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com