Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:21:04 -0400 To: "cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com" Subject: Re: Is -mno-cygwin support being removed???? Message-ID: <20000613122104.D11804@cygnus.com> Mail-Followup-To: "cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com" References: <3946544E.6AC55632@objectcentral.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20000613113951.02c4b220@pop.ma.ultranet.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20000613115501.02c5fb50@pop.ma.ultranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000613115501.02c5fb50@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 11:56:14AM -0500 On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 11:56:14AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >>found as quickly as you would like is no reason to infer that the >>"Cygwin folds" are covertly trying to remove the option. This is an >>open-source >^^^^^^ folks > >Pardon me Cygwin folks!:-) That's ok. At least it wasn't "cygwin olds". Then I really would have been upset (the truth hurts). :-) cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com