Message-Id: <200005312226.SAA29600@delorie.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
From: "Parker, Ron" <rdparker@butlermfg.com>
To: Ross Smith <ross.s@ihug.co.nz>, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: RE: Major bug -- Exception handling broken
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 17:23:27 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01BFCB4F.2AD8B696"

------_=_NextPart_000_01BFCB4F.2AD8B696
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

> Thanks, that seems to work. Are there any gotchas I need to watch out
> for when doing it this way? That is, are there any differences between
> invoking via gcc vs g++ that aren't accounted for by adding -lstdc++
> to the link step?

Not that I am aware of.  The verbose output from gcc and g++ looks identical
other than the -lstdc++ option.


------_=_NextPart_000_01BFCB4F.2AD8B696
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
------_=_NextPart_000_01BFCB4F.2AD8B696--
