Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 12:08:32 -0400
Message-Id: <200005021608.MAA20649@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com>
To: charleshixsn@earthlink.net
CC: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
In-reply-to: <390EFC6A.E7B0D281@earthlink.net> (message from Charles Hixson on
	Tue, 02 May 2000 09:03:54 -0700)
Subject: Re: Lack of Cygwin contributors?
References: <390CB60E.77861554@gingerspice.demon.co.uk> <200005011535256.SM00160@KENDALLB> <20000501184950.A9303@cygnus.com> <200005020005.UAA19448@envy.delorie.com> <390EFC6A.E7B0D281@earthlink.net>


> If I were guessing (I am), then I would guess that the FSF wasn't
> very interested in getting mixed up with a proprietary OS.

I think that's true.  They accept patches for non-free OSs in their
software, but they don't get actively involved with them.

> I would guess that this is a matter of choosing the allocation of
> resources.

Very true, but the FSF also doesn't *allow* non-free software on their
own machines.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

