Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Message-ID: <20000501193946.27666.qmail@daffy.airs.com>
Mail-Followup-To: libtool@gnu.org,
  cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com,
  mingw32@egroups.com,
  paul-ml@is.lg.ua
Date: 1 May 2000 12:39:46 -0700
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
To: paul-ml@is.lg.ua
CC: libtool@gnu.org, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com, mingw32@egroups.com
In-reply-to: <3888.000430@is.lg.ua> (message from Paul Sokolovsky on Sun, 30
	Apr 2000 21:18:58 +0300)
Subject: Re: Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases
References:  <3888.000430@is.lg.ua>

   Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:18:58 +0300
   From: Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml@is.lg.ua>

     O, I used to ask Mumit Khan why he distributes such outdated,
   19990818 binutils for mingw32, and got answer that there's bad
   attitudes of binutils maintainers towards pe frontend. Now, when
   official Cygnus release contains the same, I see that's true...

I don't think that's a fair characterization of the situation.

Ian

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com