Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 11:57:59 -0400 To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: [mingw] Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases Message-ID: <20000501115759.B5238@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Mail-Followup-To: cgf@cygnus.com, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com References: <11467.000501@is.lg.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: <11467.000501@is.lg.ua>; from paul-ml@is.lg.ua on Mon, May 01, 2000 at 11:13:44AM +0300 On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 11:13:44AM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > I cannot talk reasonably about something being wrong about PE >with binutils simply because I never tried to submit patch directly, >so cannot say that something was rejected. Moreover, look at binutils >maillist shows that, if maintainers allocate theit time proportionally >to requests, that PE really don't get top priority. Actually, I monitor the binutils mailing list and I don't see much traffic about PE. That is really irrelevant, though, since the volunteers who maintain binutils are free to spend their time however they wish. I've noticed some improvement in PE handling in current sourceware snapshots, so maybe there is hope on this front. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com